SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1921 Supreme(Mad) 52

J.WALLIS, OLDFIELD, K.SASTRI
Vairavan Chettiar Represented By – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasachariar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Oldfield, J.

1. In this reference, Second Appeal No. 932 of 1919 and all questions of law arising in it are before us. The finding we have obtained in favour of the adoption of Narasimha Aiyangar by Veeraraghava Aiyangar, not by his widow, leaves only two such questions for decision. Plaintiff is suing as assignee from the guardian of Narasimha Aiyangar of a promissory note in favour of Veeraraghava Aiyangar, which represented at the date of its execution the latters self-acquisition. Veeraraghava Aiyangar and Narasimha Aiyangar died undivided. The questions for decision are whether plaintiff is exempt from the obligation to produce a succession certificate either because he sues as an assignee from Narasimha Aiyangar, the person entitled to the debt, or because Narasimha Aiyangar should be regarded as having become entitled to the debt by survivorship.

2. The first question can be answered shortly. The Act is, as its preamble states, intended to "afford protection to parties paying debts to the representatives of deceased persons." The reference in Section 4 is generally to persons "claiming to be entitled to the effects of the deceased person or any part thereof," and under














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top