SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1918 Supreme(Mad) 150

Alla Pichai Rowthan – Appellant
Versus
Pappathiammal Alias Ammal Bibi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Two Muhammadan brothers Sanjiappa Row-than and Sheik Muhammad Rowthan acquired considerable properties. Sheik Muhammad died in 1894 and Sanjiappa Rowthan in 1901. The three plaintiffs are the widow, the son and daughter respectively of Sanjiappa. The 2nd and the 3rd defendants are the widow and daughter of Sheik Muhamad. The 1st defendant is the husband of the 3rd defendant.

2. The case for the plaintiffs is that after the death of Sanjiappa Rowthan the properties were entrusted to the management of 1st defendant on behalf of the members of the Muhammadan family, that during the management the 1st defendant misappropriated the properties, that thereupon certain mediators interceded and obtained the transfer of some of the properties to the plaintiffs and that the 1st defendant is still retaining monies belonging to the plaintiffs. The 1st defendant denied his agency and his liability to account.

3. The Subordinate Judge in an unnecessarily long Judgment has come to the conclusion that the 1st defendant managed the properties honestly until 1909, that since then he had not been discharging his duties properly and that therefore he should be held accountable for monies recei




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top