SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1919 Supreme(Mad) 231

BURN, S.AIYAR
Subramania Aiyar – Appellant
Versus
Pujari Lakshmana Goundan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sadasiva Aiyar, J.

1. The material facts are set out in the judgment of my learned brothers. I agree entirely with their conclusions Some of the observations in the judgment of Seshagiri Aiyar, J., such as "in the north, we find innumerable instances where endowments are made in the name of a reputed saint who worships the idol." "The personal sanctity of the founder seems to have had more influence in the north than in the south." "Most of the temples in the south do not owe their existence to Aryan influence but were built and endowed by the non Aryans, while the endowments in the north are mostly by Aryans", are observations based upon my learned brothers knowledge of and personal research into subjects to the study of which I have not been able to bestow as much time and industry as he. So far as I have been able to study some of the subjects referred to, my provisional conclusion is that Brabmana Hindus are not so pre dominantly Aryans in blood and non Brahmana Hindus are not so predominantly non-Aryans in blood as usually assumed, and I am not satisfied that Dravidian" is opposed to "Aryan" and does not really represent the mingling of an earlier Aryan wave of immigrat
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top