SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1919 Supreme(Mad) 330

A.RAHIM, W.AYLING
M. P. M. R. M. N. Ramanathan – Appellant
Versus
K. R. S. V. Muthiah Chetty – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdur Rahim, Offg. C.J.

1. There were two brothers belonging to the Nattukottai Chetty community, namely, Narayana Chettiar and Mathiah Chettiar. The plaintiff is the son of the former and defendants Nos. 4 to 6 are sons of the latter. The two brothers carried on money-lending business in the name of M.P.M.R.M. They had business in various places. Narayana Chettiar died fifteen years ago, and Muthiah Chettiar died about 10 years previous to the suit. At the time of the latters death, plaintiff and defendants Nos. 4 to 6 were all minors and the family was undivided. The 1st defendant in the suit is maternal uncle of defendants Nos. 4 to 6. He was appointed as agent by the mother of there defendants to manage and look after their share in the family property and the business. The 2nd defendant, who is the maternal uncle of the plaintiff, was similarly appointed by the plaintiffs mother. The suit was instituted by the plaintiff, who attained majority in 1911, for a decree directing defendants Nos. 1 and 2 to render an account to him of their management of the affairs of the family of the plaintiff and the defendants during his minority and for other reliefs.

2. The first questio








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top