SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(Mad) 112

RAMESAM
Venkatachalam Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Vijia Kumara Visvanatha Bangaru – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ramesam, J.

1. This civil miscellaneous second appeal arises in execution of a decree obtained by the appellant before me against the three defendants in O. S. No. 173 of 1911 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Munsif of Madura. In execution of this decree the plaintiff has attached and seeks to bring to sale the 2nd defendants share in the village of Vellikurichi. The 2nd defendant is a member of the family of the Nayaks, the last native rulers of the Madura District. After the attached property was advertised for sale, the Government filed a claim petition under Order 21, Rule 58 of the Civil P. C. claiming that they are entitled to the reversion in the attached property which is an unenfranchised inam and that it ought not to be sold. The 2nd defendant also filed a petition in para. 3 of which he states that the village of Vellikurchi has been held to be inalienable and impartible Kumara Thirumalai Naik v. Bangaru Tirumalai Sauri Naik [1898] 21 Mad. 310 and the same cannot possibly be attached and sold. The process of sale is clearly illegal and opposed to the incidents of the grant.

2. The District Munsif held that the village is saleable and disallowed th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top