SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(Mad) 165

KUMARASWAMI SASTRI
T. R. Govinda Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Rangammal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kumaraswami Sastri, J.

1. This is an appeal against an order of the learned Judge on the original side granting a review of the judgment and amending the decree. The order appealed against is printed on p. 14 of the printed papers. It runs as follows:

1. That the said decree dated 3rd February 1926, be amended by including therein the following clauses, viz,:

(a) That defendant 6 is entitled to provision for residence in house and premises No. 41, Badrian Street.

(b) That the room marked A in red pencil in the plan attached hereto and situate between the 1st and the 2nd compartments of the said house be allotted for use of defendant 6 as a kitchen, eating room, store room, etc., and that the room marked B in the said plan and situate in front adjoining the street verandah be allotted for living, sleeping, etc.

(c) That defendant 6 be also entitled to the use of the common passages, pipes, lavatory, washing places, etc.

(d) That defendant 6 shall have no right to let or sub-let the portion allotted to her as aforesaid and that she is allowed to entertain guests or relations in the portion allotted to her so long as he or they do not encroach upon or occupy any other portion of the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top