SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(Mad) 262

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S. K. Veeraswami Pillai
Versus
Kalyanasundaram Mudaliar
Decided On : 20 April, 1927

The omission to state the value of the property is not a material irregularity when parties differ on the value, but a gross under-statement of value in the proclamation is a serious irregularity.

Headnote:

Irregularity - Property Value - The court held that the omission to state the value of the property is not a material irregularity, especially when the parties differ on the value. A gross under-statement of value in the proclamation was considered a serious irregularity.

Fact of the Case:

The court discussed the omission to state the value of the property and its significance when parties differ on the value.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the omission to state the value of the property is not a material irregularity and a gross under-statement of value in the proclamation is a serious irregularity.

Issues: The issue of whether the omission to state the value of the property constitutes a material irregularity.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in cases where parties differ on the value of the property, the omission to state the value is not a material irregularity, and a gross under-statement of value in the proclamation is considered a serious irregularity.

Final Decision: The appeal failed and was dismissed with costs.

JUDGMENT

1. It has never been held that the omission to state the value of the property is a material irregularity. When the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor differ hopelessly as to the probable value of the property, a statement as to the value by the Court is at best a guess and the Court may, in the circumstances of a particular case, consider it better to abstain from such guess. The case in Saadatmand Khan v. Phul Kuar [1898] 20 All. 412 decided that where a Court has chosen to state the value in the proclamation, a gross under-statement is a serious irregularity. The other cases relied on by the vakil for the appellant do not help him The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top