SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(Mad) 362

RAMESAM
(Board Of Control) Sri – Appellant
Versus
Balayee Ammal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ramesam, J.

1. This is an appeal against the order of the Sub-Court of Tiruvalur passed on a petition by the President of the Board of Control, Sri Thyagarajaswami Devasthanam, of Tiruvalur. The Board of Control was appointed in pursuance of the scheme framed by this Court in Gyanasambanda Pandara v. Vaithilinga Mudaliar A.I.R. 1924 Mad. 168 on appeal from O.S. 52 of 1913, Temporary Sub-Court, Tanjore.

2. A preliminary objection has been taken by the respondents that no appeal lies. The scheme framed by the High Court contains a clause (Cl. 27) that any of the parties or the Board of Control as a body or the Advocate-General are at liberty to apply to the Court for any modification of the scheme. But the present application is not an application for any modification of the scheme and does not come under this clause. In the present application the President of the Board of Control complains that some of the kattalaidars would not send complete budgets of their receipts and expenditure, nor would deliver the cash in their hands to the treasurer as provided by Clauses 8 and 13 of the scheme and the president applies to the Court for getting the clause enforced, by attachment of
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top