1929 Supreme(Mad) 84

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Veerappudayan
Versus
Oganthappudayan
Decided On : 28 February, 1929

Interpretation of 'bonds' under the Stamp Act

Headnote:

Stamp Act - Interpretation of 'bonds' - The court held that the documents are bonds within the meaning of the Stamp Act, following the decision in Khetra Mohan Saha v. Jaimini Kanta A.I.R. 1927 Cal. 472

Fact of the Case:

The court held that the documents are bonds within the meaning of the Stamp Act, following the decision in Khetra Mohan Saha v. Jaimini Kanta A.I.R. 1927 Cal. 472

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the interpretation of 'bonds' under the Stamp Act and concluded that the documents in question fell within this definition

Issues: Interpretation of 'bonds' under the Stamp Act

Ratio Decidendi: The documents are considered as bonds within the meaning of the Stamp Act based on the precedent set in Khetra Mohan Saha v. Jaimini Kanta A.I.R. 1927 Cal. 472

Final Decision: The documents are deemed as bonds within the meaning of the Stamp Act