SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(Mad) 141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Wallace
Mir Hameed Sahib
Versus
Abdul Khadir
Decided On : 11 April, 1929

Complaints must be disposed of according to the law, and the Magistrate should hold an enquiry as necessary.

Headnote:

Complaint - Criminal Procedure Code - The court found that the complaint filed by the petitioner was still pending and directed the Magistrate to take it up for disposal according to law.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a complaint on 8th February 1928, but the Magistrate did not dispose of it in a legal manner. The petitioner sought the court's direction on the pending complaint.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the complaint was still pending and directed the Magistrate to take it up for disposal according to law.

Issues: Pending complaint disposal

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the complaint must be disposed of according to the law, and the Magistrate should hold an enquiry as deemed necessary.

Final Decision: The court directed the Magistrate to take up the pending complaint, hold an enquiry, and dispose of it according to law.

JUDGMENT

Wallace, J.

1. The present petitioner, on the referred charge sheet, put in a complaint of his own on 8th February 1928. I can find no order by the Magistrate disposing of that complaint. I gather, since the Magistrate has apparently taken no further action on that complaint, that he regarded it as disposed of by the order on the referred charge sheet. This is not a method of disposing of a complaint known to the Criminal Procedure Code. Unless, therefore, there is some other order, unknown to me, disposing of the complaint in a legal manner, that complaint must be regarded as and is still pending and the Magistrate must take it up for disposal after taking sworn statement and holding such enquiry as ho considers necessary. I am asked to hold that there is no case on the merits worth enquiry. That is a master for the trial Court to consider, and decide whether the complaint ought to be thrown out without notice to the accused or whether notice ought to issue to them. The Sessions Judges remark in the heading of the order of the Sessions Judge that accused were discharged appears to be wrong, as no notice ever went to them.

2. I direct the Magistrate to take up the complaint, if it has not been disposed of by a legal order other than the order on the referred charge sheet case, hold such enquiry as he thinks fit, and dispose of it according to law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top