SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(Mad) 426

M.NAIR
(Peddibhotla) Venkata Subbayya – Appellant
Versus
(Bhamidipati) Venkataramanayya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Madhavan Nair, J.

1. This is an application under Section 115, Civil P.C., to revise the order of the Subordinate Judge of Bapatla making the award passed by the arbitrator in O.S. No. 76 of 1923 a decree of Court. The plaintiffs suit was for a declaration of his title to the properties in the schedule together with mesne profits. There were nine defendants in the suit. Defendants 6 to 9 were alleged to be lessees of the properties holding them from the other defendants. A decree for mesne profits was also asked for in the plaint. After the issues were framed in the course of the suit, the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 5 put in a petition asking the Court to refer the subject matter of their dispute to the decision of an arbitrator under para. 1, Son. 2, Civil P.C. They appointed one Suryanarayana of Bezwada as arbitrator for the purpose of enquiring into and deciding upon the allegations in the plaint and in the written statements

2. and they undertook that they shall without filing an appeal etc, abide by the award which the said parson shall give either after holding an enquiry or without an enquiry.

3. In due course the arbitrator passed an award and an application was mad





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top