SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(Mad) 548

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Jackson
Sadayan Chetti
Versus
Emperor
Decided On : 13 December, 1929

The court has discretion under Section 257, Criminal P.C. to summon witnesses, but must consider the circumstances and reasons provided by the accused.

Headnote:

Discretion - Criminal Procedure Code - The court has a large discretion under Section 257, Criminal P.C. to summon witnesses and compel their attendance, but this discretion is not absolute.

Fact of the Case:

The accused requested an adjournment due to their lawyer's illness, and the witnesses were subsequently present for cross-examination.

Finding of the Court:

The court cancelled the sentence and ordered the case to be taken up from when the cross-examination was refused, with fines to be refunded.

Issues: The issue of compelling witness attendance and the accused's request for an adjournment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court has discretion under Section 257, Criminal P.C. but must consider the circumstances, such as the accused's explanation for an adjournment.

Final Decision: The sentence was cancelled, the case was ordered to be taken up from the point of refusal of cross-examination, and fines were to be refunded.

ORDER

Jackson, J.

1. A Magistrate has a large discretion under Section 257, Criminal P.C. and if Lakshmayya v. Emperor A.I.R. 1927 Mad. 129 goes so far as to hold that once a Magistrate has summoned witnesses under Section 257, he is bound to compel their attendance although he is satisfied that it is unnecessary for the purposes of justice, I respectfully disagree.

2. However, in the present case the accused clearly explained that they wanted an adjournment because their vakil was ill, and as the witnesses were subsequently present there is no apparent reason for not letting them be cross-examined. The sentence is cancelled and the case ordered to be taken up as from when the cross-examination was refused. Fines will be refunded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top