SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(Mad) 366

CURGENVEN
M. Lakshumanayya – Appellant
Versus
S. Rajam Ayyar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Curgenven, J.

1. These petitions arise out of an election held on 27th August 1928, to fill three vacancies in the 3rd Ward of the Wallajah Municipality. The election was conducted by the Chairman and the result, so far as it concerns us, stood as follows:

Votes.

1. T.K. Ratnavelu Chetti ... 170 Elected.

2. M. Lakshmana Iyer ... 127 "

3. K.S. Mallappa Chettiar ... 123 "

4. S. Rajam Iyyar ... 116 "

5. P. Venkataswami Naidu ... 109 "

2. Accordingly 1, 2 and 3 were declared elected. An election petition (O.P. 11 of 28) was then filed by S. Rajam Ayyar (No. 4) in the Subordinate Judges Court, Vellore, alleging that the Chairman had shown undue partiality, that he had counted votes in favour of the successful candidates which ought to have been rejected, that he employed an inadequate staff, that the results were announced without checking or verification, and that if there had been Subsequent check the petitioner and other candidates who had failed would have been elected. This petition was filed on 3rd September, and on 24th October, before the hearing had commenced, the petitioner applied for a recount (I.A. No. 699 of 28). This was granted, and the recount was carried out by a Commi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top