Phillips, J.

1. In this suit for redemption the plaintiffs who are the junior members of a tarwad sue on the strength of a. karar executed in their favour by defendant,?, the karnavan. Their right to sue was; questioned at the trial and the District Munsif found that the karar amounted to a renunciation of the karnavasthanam by defendant 7, but did not invest the plaintiffs with authority to bring this suit.. The Subordinate Judge in the appeal says:

I agree with the lower Court and hold that Ex. BB is a document of renunciation by the karnavan of all his rights in favour of the plaintiffs,

but, notwithstanding this finding has dismissed the plaintiffs suit on the ground that they were not entitled to sue.. The question, therefore, that arises in second appeal is the construction of the karar, Ex. BB. It is a long document and begins by reciting the fact that defendant 7, the karnavan had on two previous occasions entrusted other persons-with the management of the tarwad affairs but as such management was unsatisfactory he had resumed management, himself. It then recites that as he is ill and wishes to get rid of the trouble of management he entrusts all affairs of management