WALLACE
A. V. Balakrishna Menon, Late – Appellant
Versus
Kakkat Manakkal Uma Alias – Respondent
Wallace, J.
1. On the 7th December, 1920, a Bench of this Court in A.S. No. 353 of 1919 between the Official Receiver of South Malabar (Mr. A.V. Balakrishna Menon), the appellant and various respondents, decreed "that the appellant do pay to respondents 1 to 6 Rs. 452-13-6 for their costs in opposing this appeal."The short point for decision in this C.M.A. is whether or not the wording of that decree has to be taken to imply that the costs can be recovered from Mr. Balakrishna Menon personally. The Lower Court has held that t does so imply and Mr. Menon appeals. He contends that such phrasing in the decree against the Official Receiver ex-officio implies that unless the Court directs otherwise he shall not be personally liable. The respondents contend that where the Court has not said that the costs will come only out of the insolvents estate in the hands of the Official Receiver, the Official Receiver is personally liable for the costs.
2. Admittedly, Mr. Balakrishna Menon was no longer holding the office of Official Receiver when the present execution petition in which execution has issued against him personally was put in. The suit itself was filed in 1917 against the pred
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.