SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1947 Supreme(Mad) 123

RAJAMANNAR
Ponnuswami Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Kailasam Chettiar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S. Vaidyanatha Iyer for Petitioner.
N. Suryanarayana for Respondent.

Judgment.-

The plaintiff in S.C.S. No. 61 of 1945 on the file of the District Munsiff’s Court, Kulitalai, applies to revise the order of the learned District Munsiff dismissing his suit brought for recovery of Rs. 209-8-0 from the respondent. The respondent borrowed from one Nallvangalammal a sum of Rs. 100 on 2nd May, 1940 and a sum of Rs. 90 on the 24th July, 1940 agreeing to pay the amounts with interest at six per cent, per annum. Nallvangalammal died and the plaintiff claimed to be her heir and though this fact was not admitted, it is not necessary any longer to deal with this objection because the plaintiff obtained a succession-certificate in respect of the suit claim.

In the plaint it was alleged that those two loans were evidenced by two documents described as hand-letters. They were admittedly unstamped. It appears that before the trial stamp duty and penalty were levied by the Court on the footing, that they were bonds.

The defendant admitted the execution of the two documents, but pleaded that in substitution of his liability under them he had executed a promissory note on 29th April, 1944, and had made payments towards the promissory note and there was only a sum of Rs. 4





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top