SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(Mad) 118

PANCHAPAGESA SASTRI, HAPPELL
Puvvada Venkata Subbayya – Appellant
Versus
Attar Sheik Mastan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Konda Kotayya for Appellant.
M.S. Ramachandra Boo for Respondent.

Happell, J.-

The appellant filed the suit, from which this Letters Patent Appeal arises, for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,196-10-0 from the defendants. The first defendant has, however, throughout been the only contesting defendant. The learned Principal District Munsif of Ongole who tried the suit gave the appellant a decree for lis. 1,227 and an appeal by the first defendant was dismissed by the Subordinate Judge of Bapatla. The first defendant then filed an appeal in this Court which was allowed by Shahabuddin, J., on the ground that the agreement on which the respondent’s claim was based was unlawful and so void rib initio. Shahabuddin, J., however, gave leave to the plaintiff in this suit, the present appellant, to appeal from his decision.

It appears from a perusal of the plaint that the foundation of the suit claim is that three toddy shops bought in the name of the first defendant and four shops in the name of the second defendant in the Ongole Taluk for the year 1st October, 1937 to 30th September, 1938 were in fact bought for the plaintiff with money advanced by him subject to an agreement with the defendants that the plaintiff should manage the shops and enjoy the profi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top