SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(Mad) 198

MACK
S. Venkatrama Aiyar – Appellant
Versus
Unnamalai Ammal and another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.T. Rangaswami Aiyangar for Appellant.
A. Seshachariar for Respondents.

Judgment.-

This is an appeal by the plaintiff against an order of the District Judge of Vellore, dated the 5th March, 1946, remanding the suit for fresh disposal on two further issues framed with permission to the District Munsiff to admit fresh evidence at his discretion. The entire records which have been called for to clear up some doubtful points show that the suit was dismissed on 3rd July, 1946, after a fresh hearing in compliance with the remand order, and at that fresh hearing the appellant who appeared through an advocate took the suit to a conclusion on the basis of the remand order without in any way objecting to it. The plaintiff filed this civil miscellaneous appeal against the order of remand on 4th September, 1946, i.e., nearly two months after the final disposal of the suit. He has also filed an appeal before the District Judge against the ultimate dismissal of his suit.

Without going into the merits I think that a preliminary objection taken to the maintainability of this appeal must be upheld. It is conceded that it was filed in this Court in time, there being a long delay in the grant of a copy. The appellant however subsequent to the remand order did nothing what










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top