SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1930 Supreme(Mad) 17

PANDALAI
Golusu Appalanarasiah – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


ORDER

Pandalai, J.

1. This is a petition to revise the conviction of the petitioner for defamation of the complainant recorded by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Of Vizagapatam in C.C. 33 of 1928 and upheld by the learned Sessions Judge of Vizagapatam on 16th November 1928.

2. Objection is taken to the legality of the conviction on the ground that the proceedings before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate were vitiated by one of two alternative grounds: (a) that there was no complaint before the Magistrate on which he could take cognizance of the case and that the Magistrate, though informed of this defect at the very outset and objection was taken to his proceeding further with the case, brushed aside and took cognizance of the case i.e. issued process against the accused; (b) if the proceedings before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate be regarded as a continuation of those which were started by a previous complaint instituted by the complainant, the said complaint had been transferred by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate himself to the Sheristadar First Class Magistrate of Vizagapatam and was pending before him and had not been withdrawn from that file to the file of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top