R.S.RAMANATHAN
Krishnamurthy Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Venkatakrishnan – Respondent
1. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.304 of 1996 on the file of the Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Chengam.
2. The revision petitioner filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale and also for recovery of possession. The lower Court passed a decree of specific performance by Judgement and Decree dated 29.4.2004. In the decree passed there is no mention about the relief of recovery of possession and the decree only says that the plaintiff is entitled for specific performance of contract. Thereafter, the revision petitioner filed Execution Petition for execution of the sale deed as the defendants failed to execute the sale deed, the sale deed was executed by the Court on 3.1.2007 and registered as Document No.45 of 2007 on 5.1.2007. Thereafter, the revision petitioner filed E.A.No.118 of 2007 for delivery of possession of property and that petition was dismissed and against the same this revision is filed.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the Court below erred in dismissing the application for delivery of possession on the ground that the trial Court declined to grant a decr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.