SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 218

R.S.RAMANATHAN
Krishnamurthy Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Venkatakrishnan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner - G. Rajan, Advocate.
For the Respondents - R1 -C. Vediyappan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.304 of 1996 on the file of the Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Chengam.

2. The revision petitioner filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale and also for recovery of possession. The lower Court passed a decree of specific performance by Judgement and Decree dated 29.4.2004. In the decree passed there is no mention about the relief of recovery of possession and the decree only says that the plaintiff is entitled for specific performance of contract. Thereafter, the revision petitioner filed Execution Petition for execution of the sale deed as the defendants failed to execute the sale deed, the sale deed was executed by the Court on 3.1.2007 and registered as Document No.45 of 2007 on 5.1.2007. Thereafter, the revision petitioner filed E.A.No.118 of 2007 for delivery of possession of property and that petition was dismissed and against the same this revision is filed.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the Court below erred in dismissing the application for delivery of possession on the ground that the trial Court declined to grant a decr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top