M.VENUGOPAL
K. K. Annamalai – Appellant
Versus
Rakkiannan – Respondent
1. The Appellant/Defendant has filed the present Second Appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.09.1998 in A.S.No.19 of 1998 passed by the Learned Sub Judge, Gobichettipalayam in confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 24.12.1997 in O.S.No.29 of 1997 passed by the Learned District Munsif Court, Gobichettipalayam.
2. The First Appellate Court, the Learned Sub Judge, Gobichettipalayam, while delivering the Judgment in A.S.No.19 of 1998, on 16.09.1998, has among other things observed that "though there are wide contradictions in regard to the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, it cannot be construed as they change the character of the suit" and also opined that Ex.A1-Pronote dated 09.02.1994 has been proved based on the oral and documentary evidence and accordingly dismissed the appeal with costs. Earlier in the main suit, the trial Court has framed one to three issues for determination. On behalf of the Respondent/Plaintiff, witnesses P.Ws.1 and 2 have been examined and Exs.A1 and A2 have been marked. On the side of the Appellant/Defendant, D.W.1 has been examined and Exs.B1 and B2 have been marked.
3. The trial Court, after scrutinising the oral and documentary evide
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.