VINOD K.SHARMA
S. Chandrakantha – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Jolarpet Panchayat Union – Respondent
1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to re-instate the petitioner in service along with all consequential benefits.
2. The petitioner was appointed as Noonmeal Organizer under the Noonmeal Scheme. The petitioner after appointment was posted as Noonmeal Organizer in Jolarpet Panchayat School, where she worked for 30 years without any complaint.
3. The petitioner was issued charge memo on 09.08.1991 for the following charges:
(1) When the first respondent inspected the Jolarpet Panchayat Union Noonmeal centre at Kottavoor on 20.07.1991, the petitioner failed to produce provisional register, Attendance register, Inspectors register, Bank pass book;
(2) Keep the provisional materials in the House of one Chinnakannu belongs to Jolarpet Panchayat Union, Kottavoor village;
(3) Used excess of provisional materials which was exceed already allotted to the children;
(4) The Noonmeal Scheme in Kottavoor noon-meal is provided for 75 children every day. But on the date of inspection the first respondent found that Noonmeal is provided for 100 children;
(5) There was a loss of Rs.8,167
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.