SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 459

G.RAJASURIA
Special Grade Town Panchayat – Appellant
Versus
Arasi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Meenakshisundaram, Advocate.
For the Respondent: No appearance.

Judgment :-

This second appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 13.12.1999 passed in A.S. No.149 of 1997 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Tirunelveli, confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 12.12.1995 passed in O.S. 502 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Valliyoor, in decreeing the suit.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

3. The parties, for convenience sake, are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status before the trial Court.

4. Broadly but briefly, precisely but narratively, the case of the plaintiff as stood exposited from the plaint could be portrayed thus:

On 03.07.1986 she was appointed as permanent santitory worker in the Valliyoor Town Panchayat, the defendant herein. Subsequently, on 03.11.1986 she was terminated from service without adhering to the procedures. Thereupon she filed O.S.No.1156 of 1988 in the District Munsif Court, Valliyoor and got order of reinstatement. Thereupon appeal was filed in A.S.No.112 of 1991 in the Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli, which Court confirmed the Judgment and Decree and thereupon she was reinstated in Service with effect from 19.02.1992 as per order da





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top