R.BANUMATHI
R. Vino @ Veincentza – Appellant
Versus
Maria Grace Benefit Fund Ltd. , – Respondent
This revision is directed against the order in I.A.No.364 of 2007 dismissing the petition filed under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC and declining permission to file Additional Written Statement. Defendants are the revision petitioners.
2. Respondent/Plaintiff - Maria Grace Benefit Fund Limited has filed the suit for recovery of Rs.5,84,000/- with subsequent interest and cost. The Petitioners/Defendants have filed their written statement on 06.09.2006. When the suit was taken up for trial and after filing of proof affidavit, Petitioners/Defendants have filed I.A.No.364 of 2007 under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC seeking to file Additional Written Statement. In the Additional Written Statement, Petitioners/Defendants have raised the point regarding competency of Fr. Jeganivasagar to file the suit.
3. Upon consideration of submissions, the learned I Additional District Judge has dismissed the petition observing that proof affidavit was already filed and that petition has been filed with a view to delay the trial proceedings. The learned Trial Judge also observed that if the petition is allowed, it will cause prejudice to the Respondent/Plaintiff.
4. Challenging the impugned order, the learned cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.