The petitioners are questioning the legality and correctness of the order of the second respondent dated 27.12.2005.

2. The second respondent is the Joint SubRegistrar No. 2 of the Taluk Office, Tenkasi.

3. The first respondent is the District Registrar, Tenkasi.

4. The case of the petitioners is that they are friends and they purchased punja lands with standing coconut trees through five documents.

5. The details are given below:

No. Date & No. of Documents Sold by Survey No. and Extent Value Rs.

1. • 21.11.96

• 570/97 Gurusamy and others • 125/IE Acre 0.Cent 50

• 125/1G 0.51 61,000.00

2. • 31.3.96

• 1037/99 Sankariah and others • 125/1B Acre 0.Cent 27

• 125/1B Acre 0.Cent 15

• 125/1E Acre 0.Cent 10

• 125/1 Well right with 3HP motor and room including Coconut tree thereat 38,000.00

3. 21.5.99 Krishnammal 125/1C Acre 0.Cent 20 with 1/8 Well right, motor and pump room 13,200.00

4. • 5.2.01

• 223/01 Ramasamy and others • 125/1B Acre 0.Cent 34

• 125/1A Acre 0.Cent 51

• 125/IE Acre 0.Cent 20

• 125/1D Acre 0.Cent 25 with Well right half share in motor and pump room 75,000.00 5. • 19.6.02

• 1936/02 V. Kumar and others • 125/1F Acre 0.Cent 52

• 125/1D Acre 0.Cent 06

• Well, motor a