M.E.N.PATRUDU
G. Ayyakkonar – Appellant
Versus
Inspector General of Registration, Chennai – Respondent
The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of the punja land measuring about 17 acres in patta No. 5 at Arasiarpatti Village. It is further stated that he sold 5 cents of land in Survey No. 261/01 to one Aanai, through document No. 1011/88 on 2.11.1988. It is stated that the said Survey No. 261/01 measuring about 0.51.0 was deleted from patta No. 5 and separate patta No. 854 was given to Survey No. 261/01. The said Aanai is the 5th respondent in the writ.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 5th respondent in collusion with 6th respondent executed a power of attorney in favour of 6th respondent which was registered in the Sub-Registrars Office, Kovilpatti on 19.5.2004, and by using the said registered power of attorney, the 6th respondent sold the lands in patta No. 5 belonging to the petitioner and accordingly a sale deed was executed by the 6th respondent in favour of the 7th respondent on 15.6.2004 and the said sale deed was registered in the office of Sub-Registrar, Kelarajakula Raman, on 16.6.2004, in document No. 1219/2-004. It is further stated that the 5th and 6th respondents have misrepresented as if the 6th respondent owned and enjoyed the prop
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.