M.VENUGOPAL
The Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Kancheepuram Oili Mohamed – Respondent
The Appellant/10th Respondent/10th Defendant has filed the present Second Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment and Decree dated 26.03.1992 in A.S.No.41 of 1990 passed by the Learned Sub-Judge, Kancheepuram.
2.The first Appellate Court Viz., Sub-Judge, Kancheepuram, in its judgment in A.S.No.41 of 1990 dated 26.03.1992, as among other things has held that the Defendants 1 to 9 are liable to repay a sum of Rs.8,045.06/- to the 1st respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff and resultantly allowed the appeal filed by the 1st Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff with costs.
3. Before the trial Court, on the side of the 1st Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff and the Defendants no one witness was examined and no documents were marked.
4. Dissatisfied with the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.41 of 1990 dated 26.03.1992 by the first Appellate Authority Viz., Sub-Judge, kancheepuram, the Appellant/10th Respondent/10th Defendant has projected this Second Appeal before this Court.
5. At the time of admission of the Second Appeal, the following substantial questions of law have been framed by this Court.
1. Whether a public statutory body and its subordinates can be held personally liable whi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.