S.PALANIVELU
Angamuthu – Appellant
Versus
Saroja – Respondent
1. The petitioner is the 1st defendant in O.S.No.461 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani. This is a Suit for partition filed by the respondents 1 to 3. The trial was taken up. The plaintiffs evidence was over and the 1st defendant was also examined before the court. At that time, the plaintiffs filed the petition in I.A.No.62 of 2009 under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC for amending the plaint to include a relief of declaration that the Gift Settlement Deed dated 1.2.1997 executed by the deceased Chinnasamy is not binding upon the plaintiffs and also certain pleadings with regard to jurisdiction and court fee.
2. In the affidavit, the plaintiffs have alleged that the 1st respondent filed an additional Written Statement, in which he has pleaded that his father Chinnasamy had executed a Gift Settlement Deed dated 1.2.1996 in his favour, that the said Chinnasamy was not commanding good health and was bedridden at that time and the settlement deed was obtained from him by misrepresentation and unlawfully and hence the relief of declaration that the Deed is not binding upon the plaintiffs is to be incorporated in the plaint and so the amendment pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.