D.MURUGESAN
O. N. S. Hyder Ali – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar District Registrar Cadre – Respondent
1. The petitioner purchased a property consisting of house and ground premises at Door No. 30, St. Xavier Street, Madras-1 by sale deed dated 4.10.91. He got the said sale deed registered in the office of the Sub Registrar of Sowcarpet in document no. 605 of 1991 on the same day. The value of the property was Rs. 4,50,000/-. He paid initially a sum of Rs. 58,500/- towards stamp duty and a further sum of Rs. 11,700/- towards deficit stamp duty. The petitioner also paid a sum of Rs. 5,419/-towards the registration fee. The petitioner was also asked to pay a further sum of Rs. 500/- by way of additional stamp duty which was paid on 30.10.91. After the registration, the sale deed was released on 30.10.91.
2. However, by the impugned notice dated ‘Nil’ sent on 21.2.95 which was received by the petitioner on 22.2.95, the Sub Registrar, Sowcarpet directed the petitioner to pay a further sum of Rs. 45,823/-towards registration charges and stamp duty in respect of the sale deed which was registered on
4.10.91. The said notice is under challenge in this writ petition.
3. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner.
4. No counter affidavit has been filed. The facts relating to the reg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.