SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 1185

A.RAMAMURTHI
Suseela – Appellant
Versus
Ramasami Gounder – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Devaraj for Appellants.
S. Parthasarathi for Respondents.

Judgment :-

1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S. No. 97/85 and defendants 2 and 3 in OS No. 96/85, on the file of the Sub Court Namakkal have preferred these two Second Appeals, aggrieved against the judgment and decree made in AS 279/85 and AS 91/85, on the file of the District Court Salem, reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 31.7.1935.

2. The case in brief is for disposal of both the appeals are as follows: —

The plaintiff in O.S. 97/85 filed the suit for recovery of possession of the suit property. It originally belonged to one Kattiyanna Gounder and he executed a deed for maintenance in favour of his mother Kuppayammal on 10.7.1958. Since Kattiyanna Gounder did not provide maintenance as per the deed, she filed O.S. No. 1020/74 for arrears of maintenance in the Court of the District Munsif, Namakkal, which was subsequently transferred and renumbered as OS 332/75 on the file of the Sub Court, Salem. The first defendant herein was the third defendant in that suit. He set up title in himself under a revenue sale and claimed priority over the maintenance charge created in favour of Kuppayammal. However, the suit filed by Kuppayammal was decreed on 24.4.1976.




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top