K.GOVINDARAJAN
Kasi Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Govindarajan – Respondent
1. The plaintiff who failed before the courts below in getting a decree for declaration and permanent injunction has filed the above Second Appeal.
2. It is the case of the plaintiff that he is the co-owner with respect to the lands bearing Survey Nos.234/1 and 234/2. There is a well meant to irrigate the said lands. Defendants 1 to 4 are the brothers of the plaintiff/appellant, and the 5th defendant is his mother. The defendants 1 and 5 purchased the lands bearing Survey Nos.227/6A and 227/6C. According to the plaintiff, the defendants/respondents are not entitled to take water from the suit well to the said lands. So, he filed the suit in O.S.No.127 of 1983 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Manamadurai to get a decree to that effect. The 1st defendant filed written statement and the defendants 2 to 5 have adopted the same. According to the defendants they have been enjoying the suit lands separately, though no partition was effected between the brothers. According to the defendants, the plaintiff is not enjoying the suit lands bearing Survey Nos.234/1 and 234/2. Since they could not cultivate the said lands, the defendants 1 and 5 want to take water for the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.