S.S.SUBRAMANI
S. Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
V. Ranganayaki – Respondent
1. Since caveat was entered by respondents 1 and 2 (plaintiffs), when the revision came-up for admission, by consent of both parties, the entire Revision was heard.
2. Second defendant in O.S. No. 6673 of 1998, on the file of XVIII the Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, is the revision petitioner. The Revision is filed under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. Plaintiffs, who are respondents 1 and 2 in this Revision; filed the suit for injunction restraining the defendants, their men, servants or agents from in any way interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties. The property is 46 cents of land situated in Survey No. 150 in Koyambedu Village,, Madras. It is alleged in the plaint that the property originally belonged to late Duraisamy Naidu, father of plaintiffs, and it was inherited by him by way of family arrangement between himself and his brother Iyyavu Naidu. It is also said that the suit property was purchased by plaintiffs father on 5.9.1934 from one G. Venkatapathi Naidu. Ever since the date of purchase, plaintiffs and their father were in possession of the property. The total extent of the dis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.