S.S.SUBRAMANI
R. Thulasidoss – Appellant
Versus
Rani alias Rajalakshmi – Respondent
1. The decree-holder in R.C.O.P.No.16 of 1989 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Karur is the revision petitioner in both the revisions. The above revision petitions are filed under Art.227 of the Constitution of India.
2. One Govindarajulu had 8 sons and one daughter. His wife is Muthialu Ammal. The sons are G.Ramachandran, G.Venkatesan, G.Udayavar, G.Ramanujam, G.Leelakrishnan, G.Umakandan alias Munusamy, G.Baskar, G.Santhanam and G.Jayaraman. His daughter is Krishnaveni. The first respondent in this revision is the daughter of Krishnaveni.
3. The decree-holder is the adopted son of the said G.Ramachandran. The decree-holder filed revision petition against respondents 2 to 5 and obtained an order of eviction. The same was confirmed in appeal and revision also. When the proceedings was initiated for eviction, the first respondent herein filed an obstruction petition under Sec.47 of Code of Civil Procedure to declare that the eviction decree is invalid and is not liable to be executed. In this connection, it is worthwhile to note that the respondents 3 to 5 in the eviction petition are none other than the children of Udayavar who is one of the sons of Govindarajul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.