SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 1427

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Kaliaperumal – Appellant
Versus
Pankajavalli – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Rajaraman, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.137 of 1986 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli for partition of suit properties claiming 1/2 share for himself and his sister. The second defendant in the suit has contended that suit items 1 and 2 were given to her on lease by the first defendant. It is also contended by her that the above items are sold by the 1st defendant and 4th defendant to defendants 6 and 7, and they surrendered possession of items 1 and 2 to defendants 6 and 7 for valuable consideration. It is contended by the petitioner that the first respondent herein is suffering from mental disability and third parties exploited the position and defendants 6 and 7 arranged to get Sale deed fraudulently.

2. It is also stated that the husband of the respondent filed I.A.No.169 of 1993 praying for a direction to examine and cross-examine the first respondent herein. On 28.3.1994, the trial court dismissed that petition. Petitioner in this revision is one of the respondent in that Interlocutory application. This revision is filed by the petitioner on the basis of so called observations made in that order. According to the petitioner, the earlier appli













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top