SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 482

A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Pappathi Achi – Appellant
Versus
Narayanaswami – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Balachander, Advocate.
For the Respondents:V. Prabhakar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 6-7-1995 in I.A. No.

316 of 1995 in O.S. No. 456 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam. The plaintiff is the revision petitioner.

2. The petitioner filed the suit O.S. No. 456 of 1992 for recovery of a sum of Rs. 13,590/- alleging that on the morning of 19-10-1989, the respondents borrowed a sum of Rs. 10,000/- from her as hand loan at Nachiarkoil and on that evening they executed a voucher in a non-judicial stamp paper of the value of Rs. 5/- in evidence of the same end as an acknowledgment of the amount received from the petitioner, repayable together with interest at 12% per annum on demand. Since the respondents have not paid th e amount in spite of repeated demands, the petitioner issued a notice to the respondents calling upon them to pay the entire amount due. The said notice was returned with the endorsement “Left India”. The suit was thereupon filed for the recovery of the principle amount of Rs. 10,000/- due under the voucher given by the respondents on 19-10-1989 together with interest at 12% per annum, in all amounting to Rs. 13,590/- with subs

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top