E.PADMANABHAN
Rukmani – Appellant
Versus
The Divisional Manager, Marapalam Tea Division, Nadugani – Respondent
1. The petitioner seeks for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in Na.Ka. No. 1259/90 dated 8-5-1993 and quash the same and direct the respondent to provide continuous employment to the petitioner.
2. The respondent has entered appearance, but had not filed counter and hence this Court had to decide this Writ Petition on the basis of affidavit filed by the petitioner and the material papers placed by her.
3. The impugned order passed by the respondent reads thus:
Tamil
Admittedly, the petitioner is a permanent woman plantation labourer in the employment of the respondent. It is totally unknown to services as well as industrial law as to how the petitioner, could be compelled or required to secure ‘No Objection’ certificate from her former husband (mentioned as Tamil).It is rather unexpected, a Divisional Manager of Government of Tamil Nadu undertaking to have issued such a direction even at the end of 20th century. The attitude of the respondent in directing and insisting for production of ‘No Objection’ certificate of this nature is nothing but a social evil, which requires to be eradicated. This attitude of the respon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.