SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 1249

NARAYANA KURUP, A.KULASEKARAN
Sunil Jain – Appellant
Versus
Negarathinam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Raghavachari, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S.L. Sundarsanam, P.V. Manoharan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

K. Narayana Kurup,J.

1. O.S. As at the instance of the fifth and sixth defendants in C.S. No.21 of 2000 on the file of this Court, in which, the following prayers have been made;

(i) directing the defendants to jointly and severally bind themselves to pay sum of Rs.11,00,000/- as damages to the plaintiff

(ii) issuing mandatory injunction directing defendants 5 and 6 to strictly comply with all the relevant rules and regulations of the Corporation of Chennai, so far as it relates to the planning permission issued to the defendants 5 and 6 to put up construction at No.29-A Nowroji Road, Chetpet, Chennai-31 and directing the defendants not to put up construction in any manner either permanent or of a temporary nature, measuring 600 sq.ft. which is shown in the plan annexed with the plaint and also directing the defendants that the passage on the southern side of the plaintiff’s property is kept totally free of passage for the use of the plaintiff and his family.

(iii) issuing a mandatory injunction directing the defendants 5 and 6 to remove the unauthoritsed construction put up and presently existing at No.29-A Nowroji Road, Chennai-3 and

(iv) issuing a permanent injunction r










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top