S.S.SUBRAMANI
M. Shanmugam – Appellant
Versus
C. Kannabiran – Respondent
1. Tenant in R.C.O.P No. 13 of 1987, on the file of Controller-Cum-District Munsif, Arkonam is the revision petitioner.
2. Eviction petition was filed by the first respondent herein on the ground that the petitioner herein has committed wilful default in paying the rent. He has also staled that the building is required for the owners occupation. Further grounds of eviction are, unauthorised sub-letting and acts of waste alleged to have been committed by the tenant materially affecting the utility of the building.
3. In this Revision we are concerned only with the grounds of sub-letting and acts of waste. The other two grounds of wilful default and owners occupation were found against the landlord. The landlord has not filed any Revision, and the same has become final.
4. In so far as the ground of sub-letting is concerned, the case put forward by the first respondent is that the second counter petitioner in the eviction petition has been unauthorisedly inducted into the building where he is doing watch repairing business. It is said that the tenancy was with the petitioner herein, who was conducting a provision store. At present, he is not making use of the demised build
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.