THANIKKACHALAM
Ramalinga Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasa Chettiar – Respondent
1. The defendant is the appellant herein. The plaintiff filed O.S. No. 170/78 on the file of District Munsif, Court at Chidambaram, for possession after removal of superstructure in the suit property and for past mesne profits. The case of the plaintiff is as under:
2. The suit property belongs to the plaintiff. The defendant became a tenant of the property under the plaintiff on 30.4.1996 on a monthly rent of Rs. 4/-. The rent is payable on or before the 30th of every month. If there is any default in payment of rent before the 30th of every month, the defendant is bound to pay Rs. 5/-. The tenancy was for a period of three years. The rental agreement was executed between the plaintiff and the defendant on 30.4.1966 incorporating the abovesaid clause. Even after the expiry of the lease period, the tenant has been in possession of the suit property as a tenant holding over. He was irregular in payment of rent. After May 1978, a sum of Rs. 321/- is due and payable by the defendant towards the arrears of rent. The plaintiff sent a notice on 19.10.1977 to the defendant terminating the tenancy with the expiry of 29.11.1977 and demanding him to surrender the possession of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.