K.GOVINDARAJAN
Dorali Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Ganeshmal – Respondent
1. The tenant who suffered eviction before the authorities below has filed the above Revision.
2. The landlady filed the H.R.C.O.P. No. 53 of 1977 on the file of the Rent Controller, Tirupattur, to vacate the Petitioner and one Rangan, from the premises in question under Sections 10(2)(c), 10(2)
(a) and 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act 1960. According to the landlady, the rent payable by the tenant was Rs. 45/- Per month. The petitioner was running a ‘Maligai’ business in the said premises. According to the landlady the petitioner herein committed default in payment of rent from October 1976. It is her further case that the petitioner is not running the ‘Maligai’ business in the said premises but he is running the said business in Cutchery Street and he had sub-let the northern portion of Door No. 27 to the second respondent in that R.C.O.P. on a monthly rent of Rs. 60/- without any consent of the landlady. According to the landlady, she wants to demolish the premises in order to construct a new building. According to her, she applied for necessary planning permission and obtained the same. She has al so stated that she is having necessary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.