SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 926

S.JAGADEESAN
Vellaichamy Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Jayashree – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:K. Srinivasan Advocate.
For the Respondent: ---

Judgment :-

1. The appellants are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent. They filed the Guardian O.P. No. 105 of 1994 before the Principal District Court, Tuticorin for appointing themselves as the Guardian of the minors Venkatesh and Dinesh Babu and for direction directing the respondent herein to handover the custody of the minors to the appellants. The case of the appellants is that the respondent married the only son of the Appellants on 9.7.1986. The abovesaid minors were born out of the said wedlock. Their only son died on 13.5.1990 and thereafter the respondent was living jointly with the appellants along with the children. Suddenly, the respondent left the house in April, 1991 and refused to come back and started to live with her parents at Kovilpatti. The respondent got married on 25.10.1993 without informing the appellants and since she got remarried, she cannot be the legal guardian for the minors.

2. The respondent herein filed counter stating that the appellants gave troubles and tortured the respondent and her children stating that they are the main cause for the death of their only son and drove her away from the house. She joined with her parents and




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top