SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 617

GOVARDHAN
B. Narasimha Rao, Proprietor, Sree Sathyanarayana Company – Appellant
Versus
G. Narayana Rao – Respondent


Judgment :-

GOVARDHAN, J.

1. A. No. 484/1995: The applicant in his affidavit contends as follows: The suit is filed for recovery of Rs. 12,76,809.33. The defendants received from the plaintiff financial assistance for the purpose of investments in their sister concerns. They agreed to pay interest on the borrowing of Rs. 1 lakh. In the second defendant Company, the first defendant is the Managing Director. He stood guarantee for the due repayment of the amount. After utilising the amount borrowed, they have failed to repay the same, and a commission of 1% has to be paid to the first defendant. The second defendant used to deduct tax at source for outstanding interest and the amount due by the first defendant. Tax was deducted at source. The first defendant issued a cheque towards the amount due. The plaintiff made a demand through his advocate. The defendants put forward a false plea denying the borrowing. The defendants are heavily involved in debts. The defendants are owning the immovable properties which have been mortgaged in favour of the State Bank of Hyderabad. They have let out the premises on a rent of Rs. 85,000/- per month in favour of the State Bank of India, Tirupathi. T













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top