GOVARDHAN
S. Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Dr. M. S. Gopalakrishnan – Respondent
1. The applicant in his affidavit contends briefly as follows: The applicant-plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 12 lakhs against respondents 1 to 3 jointly and severally. Against the respondents 1 and 2, the claim is for Rs. 4 lakhs and against the third respondent, it is Rs. 8 lakhs. The applicant is a Real Estate Consultant. The first respondent is the owner of the suit schedule property bearing Door No. 107, Harrington Road, Chetput. The first respondent was looking out for a Real Estate Consultant for vacating his tenant viz., Civil Supplies Limited a wing of the Civil Supplies Department and was also contemplating to promote the property with prospective builders-cum-promoters. The first respondent being a permanent resident of U.S.A., the second respondent was acting as Power of Attorney of the first respondent and he had negotiated with the applicant for evicting the tenant and for promoting a multi-storeyed complex in the property. The applicant with his efforts had evicted the tenant and had incurred substantial expenses for the same. The third respondent who is a reputed builder in the City, was recommended by the applicant for the joint venture o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.