PRATAP SINGH
E. K. Mani – Appellant
Versus
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Madras, etc. – Respondent
1. These revision petitions are directed against the orders passed in Appn. No. 24 of 1992 in O.P. No. 173 of 1991 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Madras and the order passed in unregistered M.P. in SR. No. 1913 of 1993 in O.P. No. 347 of 1993 on the file of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madras, respectively.
2. Short facts in C.R.P.N. 2215 of 1992 are:—
The second respondent had filed a complaint under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Madras and an ex parte order was passed. For setting aside the ex parte order, a petition was filed by the revision petitioner. That was dismissed by the District Forum holding that it is not maintainable. Aggrieved by the same, the opposite party in O.P. No. 173 of 1991 has come forward with this revision petition.
3. Short facts in C.R.P. No. 3944 of 1993 are:—
The second respondent had filed a complaint against the petitioner under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and an ex parte order was passed. To set side the same, the petitioner filed a petition in unregistered M.P. in SR. No. 1913 of 1993 in O.P. No. 347 of 1993. Aft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.