BAKTHAVATSALAM
S. Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
District Educational Officer, Cheyyar – Respondent
1. When the miscellaneous petitions came up for hearing, by consent of both parties, the main writ petitions are taken up for final disposal.
2. The prayer in W.P. No. 12333 of 1993 is as follows:
“to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents herein from interfering with the rights of the petitioner herein to continue on reemployment till 31.5.1994 as Headmaster of the C.S.I. Elementary School at Nilkuppam, Arkonam, taluk.”
3. The prayer in W.P. No. 15798 of 1993 is to issue an order or direction or writ more specifically writ of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue in service as P.G. Assistant in the first respondent school on reemployment terms till 31.5.1994.
4. The prayer in W.P. No. 1579 of 1993 is to issue an order or direction or writ more specifically writ of mandamus directing the respondents and also the petitioner to continue in service as Tamil Pandit is the first respondent school on re-employment terms till 31.5.1994.
5. The prayer in W.P. No. 16935 of 1993 is to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings issued in Memo No. 52041 F1/60-1 Education dated 8.10.1969 issued by the Dir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.