GOVINDASAMY
K. Vaidyanatha Sastri – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Settlement Officer, Branch Settlement Office, Pudukkottai – Respondent
1. This court by order dated 22-1-1973 in W.P. No. 891 of 1971 directed that the Assistant Settlement Officer concerned shall take up the subject matter on file and deal with it in the light of the observations and directions contained in the said order. In pursuance of the abovesaid order of this Court, the Assistant Settlement Officer in his proceedings dated 19-6-1975 in S.R. 1/G.R Revision/73 remanded by High Court observed as follows:
“A careful scrutiny of Ex. Durbar records reveals that a number of sites in T.S. No. 273 have been assigned during the period in and around 1939. The petitioner has got the release deed in his favour only in the year 1956. Further during the Durbar Settlement in 1912 the suit lands have been registered as Natham Poramboke and grazing ground. Against the treatment of it either his predecessor or any other person has not contested. It clearly proves that his predecessor has not got any title over the suit properties during the time of Durbar till to the execution of release deed in favour of the petitioner. On the same point of view the claim of the petitioner that the suit land are all his private property and he is in possession of them
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.