These two appeals arise out of interlocutory applications filed by the appellant for an injunction, and by the respondent for vacating the interim injunction. The appellant is indisputably the owner of the property in question. The appellant-trust appointed the respondent as an agent for taking care of its properties under a letter dated 18.10.1984 marked as Ex.P-1 in the case. The letter reads as follows:

“Be it known that I, hereby, authorise on behalf of the Rukmani Devi Arundale Trust, from this day, the 18th day of October, 1984, Mr.S.Easwaran, son of Sri E.Subramony, No.85, Amman Sannadhi Street, Shencottah to be incharge as representative of the Trust and take such action he deems necessary to furtherance of the Trust lands comprised in Survey Nos.511/1, 55/2 and 511/3 aggregating to 6.73 acres of Courtallam Revenue Village, Tenkasi Taluk of Tirunelveli District.”

It is not necessary to refer toother documents. But suffice it to point out that the appellant terminated the agency by its letter dated 4.5.1990 and called upon the respondent to render accounts. The suit has been filed for rendition of accounts and for an injunction restraining the respondent from interf