Mishra, J.

O.S. Appeal No. 142 of 1991:

Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the second respondent.

2. This appeal is preferred against an order passed in an Application No. 416 of 1991 under Order 14 Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules of this Court read with Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The learned single Judge who heard the application took notice of the facts of the case and he came to the conclusion that a prima facie case warranting interim injunction had been made out. He has accordingly made an order of temporary injunction in these words:

“Therefore, I am of the firm view that the applicant/plaintiff has established his case and that consequently, he has succeeded in this application, with the result, both the defendants/respondents, their agents, servants, representatives and distributors or restrained from in anyway interfering with the copyright of the plaintiff in respect of the suit picture “Meenava Nanban” either by telecasting or by exhibiting the same through video cassettes or by producing the video cassettes containing the said picture during the pendency of the suit by means of a temporary injunct