SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 139

K.M.NATARAJAN, VENKATASWAMI
N. Sripadmanabha Nadar – Appellant
Versus
P. Ramalinga Nadar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties: --------

Judgment :-

K.M. NATARAJAN, J.

1. The unsuccessful first defendant before the courts below has preferred this Letters Patent Appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed in A.S. No. 1150 of 1979 rendered by a learned single Judge of this court.

2. The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:—


The respondents filed the suit for a declaration that the Kaikkan Pathy Narayanaswamy Trust is the private family trust of the respondents and others, namely, the appellant/first defendant and defendants 2 to 10 for removal of the appellant from management; for appointing new trustees and vesting trust properties in them; for rendition of accounts by the appellant from 28.8.1983 and for settling a scheme. The case of the respondents-plaintiffs is that one Parameswaran Nadar constructed a temple and installed, Narayanasami therein and he was conducting daily poojas, monthly kattalais and yearly festivals. The said Parameswaran Nadar acquired 11 items of properties for the said purposes. Respondents 1 and 2 are the sons of Parameswaran Nadar. Respondents 3 and 4 are his major grand-sons. During his life time, Parameswaran Nadar himself has constituted as


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top