SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 60

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAM
Kudiyan & Others
Versus
B. Ranganathan
CR.P. No. 2844 of 1990
Decided On :Decided on : 25-01-1991

Advocates Appeared:
V.R. Venkataraman for petitioners
G. Vasudevan for respondent.

Courts have the authority to order police assistance to ensure the obedience of their injunction orders when a litigant faces obstruction or non-cooperation from the other party.

Headnote:

Court Order - Implementation of Injunction - The court has the authority to order police assistance to implement its injunction orders when a litigant faces obstruction or non-cooperation from the other party.

Fact of the Case:

The court ordered police assistance to implement its earlier injunction order, which the petitioners objected to, claiming that such a direction cannot be issued to the police authorities who are not parties to the proceedings.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that it was within its authority to order police assistance to ensure the obedience of its injunction order, especially when a litigant faced obstruction or non-cooperation from the other party.

Issues: Objection to court ordering police assistance to implement injunction

Ratio Decidendi: The court has the authority to resort to law enforcement machinery to ensure obedience of its orders when a litigant faces obstruction or non-cooperation from the other party.

Final Decision: The civil revision petition was dismissed with costs.

Judgment :-

1. By ordering police help the court below had merely taken the follow up steps to implement its earlier order of injunction. The objection that a direction of that nature cannot be issued to the police authorities, who are not parties to the proceedings, raised by the petitioners has no substance. When the court finds that a litigant, who had obtained an order from it, is not in a position to have its full benefit owing to either the obstruction or non-cooperation of the other party to the proceedings, it is always open to the court to resort to the law enforcement machinery to see that its order is obeyed and I do not see anything illegal or irregular about it. The civil revision petition is dismissed with costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top